Méid an Téacs

Folúntas: Coláiste Daibhéid

Meitheamh 30, 2014

Sonraí ar www.educationposts.ie.

Speech for Dáil Debate – Houses of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Education and Social Protection Report on the Draft General Scheme of an Education (Admission to Schools) Bill 2013

Meitheamh 30, 2014

Ceann Comhairle,

I am delighted to have this opportunity today to participate in a debate about the Joint Committee’s pre-legislative report on my proposed Admission to Schools Bill.

Last September I published a draft regulatory framework for discussion ahead of enacting legislation.

The framework consisted of the Draft General Scheme for an Education (Admission to Schools) Bill and the associated draft regulations.

This followed on from a public consultation process that was held in 2011.

It is not generally the case that draft regulations are provided alongside the general scheme of a bill.

However, I was anxious to do so in this case in order to facilitate a comprehensive discussion on the full range of measures to be provided – whether in the bill or in regulations.

The draft General Scheme was referred to the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Education and Social Protection last September to allow a full public discussion.

The Committee invited written submissions from interested individuals or groups and a total of 57 submissions were received.

As part of its work the Committee held 3 days of public hearings which facilitated discussion with relevant stakeholders including representatives of parents and education partners among others.

The report was published on 5th March of this year.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Committee for its work in facilitating public discussion on the draft proposals for this legislation.

I would also like to record my appreciation to all those that made submissions and presentations to the Committee.

The Committee’s report contains 14 conclusions: some relating to the draft general scheme and others relate to the draft regulations which I published alongside the draft general scheme.

These recommendations are being considered by my Department in parallel with the drafting of the Bill that is currently underway.

There will also be opportunity to consider them while the Bill, when published, goes through the various stages of the House.

Today’s debate gives an additional opportunity for me to hear the views of members of this House on the Committee’s report.

When considering the Committee’s report it is important to note that our aim with the draft framework is to create a new more parent-friendly, equitable and consistent approach to how school admissions policy should operate for all 4,000 plus primary and post-primary schools.

Its purpose is to improve access to schools for all pupils and to ensure there is consistency, fairness and transparency in the admissions policies of all schools and in the service they provide to parents.

Throughout this process, I have been anxious to ensure that we have a fair and balanced school admissions process.

I know that many parents are happy with the schools their children attend and that the vast majority of schools are inclusive and welcoming places.

But there are cases where there is disappointment and dissatisfaction, with limited means of dealing with this.

The draft framework seeks to strike an appropriate balance between school autonomy and the interests of parents in our education system.

For the reported 80% of schools that enrol all pupils the impact of the framework will be relatively marginal.

For the remaining 20% of schools that are oversubscribed, the framework specifies a small number of oversubscription criteria that will not be permissible.

Otherwise schools have discretion on how they prioritise applicants for admission (provided it is lawful from an equality perspective).

The General Scheme involves the introduction of new primary legislation that will:

  • Require all admission policies to include an explicit statement that the school will not discriminate against any applicant on grounds of – disability, special educational need, sexual orientation, family status, member of traveller community, race, civil status, gender, faith or religious tradition or no faith
  • Set out the powers of the Minister to regulate school admissions
  • Provide that it is the function of a principal to implement admission policy
  • Replace Section 29 appeal process against refusal to enrol decisions with a local appeal to Board of Management
  • Provide the Child and Family Agency and the NEWB with the power to designate a school for a child with no place
  • Provide for a school to appeal against a designation
  • Provide the Minister with the power to require schools in an area to co-operate regarding admissions
  • Introduce compliance measures that provide for the patron and/or Minister to appoint an independent person to operate the schools admission policy. The Minister would be required to seek court approval to exercise this sanction.

The legislative framework takes admissions out of the Section 29 appeals process because it is not fit for purpose.

It is cumbersome and creates a significant administrative burden.

The Section 29 appeal process has a significant flaw as it makes no distinction between a child not getting enrolled in a school of choice and a child who has no school place.

The experience is that in situations where demand exceeds supply, Section 29 appeals are generally futile – the school refused admission simply because it did not have enough places.

The committee report raised the need to consider the retention of Section 29 appeals or some form of external appeal mechanism.

I still plan to remove admission as it is currently provided for in Section 29, but I am considering what alternative approaches may be possible.

At the same time, I am conscious that there is a desire to retain all decision making on these matters at school level, to avoid infringing on school autonomy.

I am particularly interested in hearing the views of members in this debate on how best to balance school autonomy on one hand, and access to an external statutory appeal mechanism that would impose decisions on schools on the other.

The Oireachtas Committee report also expressed concerns regarding the proposal for a school to be permitted to refuse admission based on provision of Gardaí/HSE advice.

Having regard to this conclusion and also the particular concerns raised by the National Council for Special Education (NCSE) and the Ombudsman for Children in relation to this issue, the provision in question has been removed from the General Scheme.

The framework also strengthens our capacity to cater for children who cannot get any school place.

This is important and particularly so for children that are vulnerable or at risk.

The aim is to get such a child a school place in a timely manner.

For those children who cannot get any school place there are new powers for the National Council for Special Education (NCSE) and the Child and Family Agency to designate a school place for such a child.

This power should ensure the timely allocation of a school place for such children.

Up to now the parents of these children would generally have made multiple appeals to Section 29 Committees without success.

The regulations, which will be reviewed following further consultation, provide for the following:

  • A common national earliest date for the commencement of enrolment across the school system.
  • Subject to limited exceptions the default position is that if a school has capacity it must enrol all applicants.
  • Other than recognised fee-charging schools, parents are not charged any booking deposits, fees or other payments as a condition of initial enrolment or for continued enrolment.
  • Parents will see in advance from the enrolment policy the oversubscription criteria the school will use if demand exceeds supply.
  • Schools have discretion on what oversubscription criteria they use provided they are not one of the listed criteria that are not permissible.
  • If a school was oversubscribed in the previous year or expects to be in the coming year, parents can see from the information provided by the school which categories of applicants were successful in the previous year’s enrolment process (this will be a useful and early indicator to the parent on the chances of being allocated a school place).
  • If an applicant is unsuccessful in getting a school place then the parent will be given the reasons why the applicant failed to meet the enrolment criteria (this transparency should bring clarity for a parent and help reduce appeals).

The draft regulations that were published provide that it is not permissible to prioritise applicants on basis of:

  • Attendance at any particular pre-school, crèche
  • Attendance at meeting, open day or interview
  • Date of birth (except at primary level)
  • Order in which applications were received (5 year transition period to phase out waiting lists)
  • Past pupil (limited derogation for existing schools that use this criteria)
  • Financial contribution or commitment to same
  • Academic ability, skills or aptitude
  • Occupation or financial status of the student’s parents

The Oireachtas Committee report made of number of conclusions regarding the regulations which involved earlier phasing out of waiting lists and removal of the past pupil derogation.

These issues relate to the draft regulations.

In relation to waiting lists, the draft regulations prohibit waiting lists generally but provide a limited derogation to allow schools which have traditionally used this approach to phase out existing waiting lists over a five year period.

The report recommends that this should be done over a shorter period unless there are legal obstacles.

This issue will be further examined.

In addition, the report questioned how school enrolment difficulties that children in care may experience could be best addressed.

This matter will be further considered in consultation with the Department of Children and Youth Affairs.

In relation to the proposed derogation in the draft regulations to allow schools, in certain circumstances, to give priority to children of past pupils, the Committee considers that there should be no such derogation, and that a school should not be permitted to give priority to a student on the grounds that he or she is the son or daughter of a former student of the school.

In addition the Committee considers that a school should be permitted to give priority to a student who has a sibling who is currently attending the school.

The draft regulations provide for some limited priority to be given to the children of past pupils of a school.

The approach taken aimed to strike a balance by limiting the number of places that can be allocated in this manner to a maximum of 25%.

This issue will be reflected on further following consultation. It should be noted that the draft regulations do, in fact, permit priority to be given to pupils who have a sibling currently attending the school.

I would like to take this opportunity to clarify that the draft framework is primarily focused on the mainstream enrolment of junior infants at primary level and first years at post-primary level.

The framework will be refined to ensure that it takes account of enrolment in special classes and special schools.

I also acknowledge that some adjustment will need to be made to the scheme to ensure that there are no unintended consequences in the legislation for the arrangements for enrolment in other situations such as enrolment in post leaving certificate courses.

Before I conclude, I would like to state that I intend to include an amendment to Section 28 of the Education Act as part of this Bill which would provide the legislative underpinning for a Parents and Learners Charter.

The purpose of the Parents and Learners Charter is to:

  • Strengthen the position of parents within the school system and to bring about a culture change in how schools engage with and involve parents (and students in an age related manner),
  • Foster a culture of better engagement and communication by schools with parents and students which should ultimately reduce the need for invoking the complaints and grievances procedures.

The aim of these legislative proposals is to ensure fairness and transparency in school enrolment.

The framework constitutes a significant public service reform aimed at substantially improving the experience between the public and schools on student admission.

Transforming our public services and ensuring that the citizen is at the heart of how public services operate is an important objective of the Government.

The Oireachtas Committee report recognises the need for school admission practices to adapt to meet the circumstances of a diverse and changing society and comments that the legislative proposals “address a range of factors that cause frustration and obstacles at present. At the same time, they aim to allow schools as much autonomy as possible”.

I have made it clear that I will look at refining elements of the framework if it becomes clear from the consultation process that such changes are necessary and appropriate while at the same time continuing to ensure that all applicants for enrolment are treated in a fair, consistent and transparent manner.


Folúntas: Gaelscoil Sáirséal

Meitheamh 30, 2014

Oidí le Gaeilge líofa agus suim sa Ghaeloideachas atá ag teastáil. Ní ghlacfar le h-aon iarratas i mBéarla. Úsáidfear na h-iarratais chun aon phost eile a thiocfaidh chun cinn laistigh de cheithre mhí a líonadh. Sonraí ar www.educationposts.ie.

Folúntas: Gaelscoil na Mí

Meitheamh 30, 2014

Ard-chaighdeán Gaeilge de dhíth. Post Roinnte idir Ghaelscoil na Mí, Gaelscoil an Bhradáin Feasa & Gaelscoil Bhaile Brigín atá i gceist, sonraí ar www.educationposts.ie.

Coldplay Vs Lurgan “Sky Full of Stars” as Gaeilge

Meitheamh 30, 2014

Scoláirí Chúrsa A i gColáiste Lurgan in éineacht le Keith O Briain as Seo Linn lena leagan de ” Sky Full of Stars” le Coldplay. Seo an chéad fhíseán de cheanna chúrsa A 2014: Féach an físeán anseo.

Fós le teacht ó chúrsa A:
Ríoga “Royals” le Lorde
Clisare Vs Iggy Azalea — Nach mé ‘tá Fancy
HOLI — 2K14 — Calvin Harris & Avicii
One Republic — Counting Stars
Baton Rouge — Maitiú Ó Domhnaill
John Newman — Bhfuil tú fós ann? — “Love me again”

Faoi na soilse,
Ag lonradh thuas os mo chionn
Tá mé ag tairiscint mo chroí
Faoi na soilse,
Ag lonradh thuas os mo chionn
Tá sí ar tosach na slí
Tá mé saor
Ach is léir nach bhfuil tú
Do mo stróiceadh ‘tá tú
Sé faoi na soilse,
Ag lonradh thuas os mo chionn
Go bhfeicfidh mé thú

Tá mé saor
Ach is léir nach bhfuil tú
Do mo stróiceadh ‘tá tú
Sé faoi na soilse,
Ag lonradh thuas os mo chionn
Go bhfeicfidh mé thú
Go bhfeicfidh mé thú

Mar is geal
Mar is geal do ghrá
Mar is réalta thú
Is fíor gur réalta thú

Is fíor gur réalta thú

‘Croíról’ ag Altram – Roinn Oideachais an Tuaiscirt

Meitheamh 30, 2014

Tá an Roinn Oideachais i dTuaisceart Éireann le “maoiniú eatramhach” a chur ar fáil don eagras réamhscolaíochta, Altram – eagras atá i ndiaidh a maoiniú a chailleadh ó Fhoras na Gaeilge – ach eagras a bhfuil “croíról” ag a gcuid seirbhísí sa Ghaeloideachas, de réir na roinne. Thug an Roinn Oideachais le fios i ráiteas inniu go mbeadh “easnamh” i maoiniú Altram “le haghaidh seirbhísí réamhscolaíochta i ndiaidh na n-athruithe a thug Foras na Gaeilge isteach mar gheall ar chinneadh de chuid na hAireachta Thuaidh Theas anuraidh”.

Dúirt Aire Oideachais an Tuaiscirt, John O’Dowd (SF), go raibh Altram ag soláthar “réimse de shaintacaíocht thábhachtach d’earnáil na réamhscolaíochta Gaeilge. Tá éiginnteacht ag baint faoina bhfuil i ndán do chuid de na seirbhísí. I bhfianaise na tábhachta atá, dar liom féin, leis an chroíról atá ag seirbhísí oideachais luathbhlianta maidir le soláthar fhíseanna agus chuspóirí na Roinne tá socraithe agam roinnt maoiniú gearrthéarmach idirthréimhseach a chur ar fáil le seirbhísí a chosaint san eastodhchaí.

“Comhairle na Gaelscolaíochta a bhainisteoidh an maoiniú le seirbhísí riachtanacha tacaíochta a chothabháil sa soláthar réamhscolaíochta Gaeilge. Tá rún agam fosta an dóigh le seirbhísí a chur ar fáil don earnáil seo a athbhreithniú lena chinntiú gur féidir bealach chun cinn níos straitéisí a shocrú agus a fheidhmiú chomh luath agus is féidir”.

Bhí Altram ar cheann de na grúpaí a chaill maoiniú ó Fhoras na Gaeilge i ndiaidh gur chuir an foras atheagar ar an earnáil dheonach agus laghdaíodh líon na n-eagras ó 19 go sé cinn. Tá na sé cheanneagraíocht in ainm tús a chur lena ré nua ar an tseachtain seo chugainn ach níl eolas cruinn ar fáil faoi láthair cé mhéad duine a bheas fostaithe acu. Tá cainteanna ar siúl idir na ranna thuaidh agus theas, an foras agus na heagraíochtaí iad féin faoin cheist seo i rith an ama.


Deireadh le heagrais Ghaeilge ach an Foras beo i gcónaí

Meitheamh 30, 2014

Is é inniu, 30 Meitheamh 2014, an lá a thiocfaidh deireadh oifigiúil le maoiniú na n-eagraíochtaí Gaeilge a fágadh ar an trá fholamh de bharr an ‘Samhla Nua Maoinithe’.

Tá 11 eagraíocht i gceist – Forbairt Feirste, Pobal, Iontaobhas Ultach, Altram, Comhaltas Uladh, Comhar na Múinteoirí Gaeilge, an Comhlachas Náisiúnta Drámaíochta, Forbairt Naíonraí Teoranta, Comhdháil Náisiúnta na Gaeilge agus Comhluadar.

Thosaigh scéal truamhéalach na Samhla siar in 2008 nuair a mhaígh an tAire Pobail, Tuaithe agus Gaeltachta ag an am, Éamon Ó Cuív, go raibh an iomarca eagraíochtaí Gaeilge ann.

Ghlac Foras na Gaeilge leis an tuairim seo agus chuir siad tús leis an bpróiseas leasaithe.

Thóg sé sé bliana chun an próiseas seo a chríochnú – is leor sin amháin leis an droch-chaoi a láimhseáladh an ‘leasú’ seo a léiriú.

B’fhéidir go raibh an ceart ag an Aire Ó Cuív go raibh an iomarca eagraíochtaí ann, ach níor leagadh amach an cruthúnas go raibh an maíomh seo cruinn riamh.

Chuir na heagraíochtaí in éadan an phróisis go mór, ach tugadh cluas bhodhar dá dtuairimí.

Tugadh an chluas bhodhar d’aighneachtaí an phobail chomh maith.

Rinneadh cásanna speisialta de Raidió na Life, Raidió Fáilte agus An tÁisaonad agus tháinig sé eagraíocht eile slán ó slad faoi na sé réimse a phioc an Foras; Gaelscoileanna (Gaeloideachas agus Réamhscolaíocht Lán-Ghaeilge), Conradh na Gaeilge (Ardú Feasachta, Cosaint Teanga agus Ionadaíocht), Gael Linn (Oideachas in earnáil an Bhéarla agus d’aosaigh, agus deiseanna úsáide do dhaltaí scoile), Oireachtas na Gaeilge (Deiseanna a thacaíonn le hÚsáid na Gaeilge agus le Bunú Gréasán), Glór na nGael (Forbairt Pobail agus Eacnamaíochta) agus Cumann na bhFiann (Forbairt Deiseanna Úsáidte Gaeilge agus Gréasán do Dhaoine Óga).

Beidh orthu teacht i gcomharbacht ar an obair a bhí ar bun ag na heagraíochtaí a caitheadh i dtraipisí.

Mar shampla, beidh ar Ghaelscoileanna an obair a bhí ar bun ag Forbairt Naíonraí Teoranta agus Altram a dhéanamh amach anseo.

Ní bheidh cúraimí Chonradh na Gaeilge (Ardú Feasachta, Cosaint Teanga agus Ionadaíocht) ró-dhifriúil ón obair atá ar bun acu faoi láthair ach tá ról níos leithne ag Oireachtas na Gaeilge – ‘Deiseanna a thacaíonn le hÚsáid na Gaeilge agus le Bunú Gréasán’ agus ag Gael Linn – ‘Oideachas in earnáil an Bhéarla agus d’aosaigh, agus deiseanna úsáide do dhaltaí scoile’.

An mbeidh na sé eagraíocht in ann don dúshlán seo, agus an mbeidh siad ábalta leanúint leis an obair eile a bhí ar bun acu go dtí seo?

Tá deireadh tagtha le maoiniú na n-eagraíochtaí ar fad ó thuaidh, agus neart amhrais go mbeidh na heagraíochtaí atá fágtha ó dheas in ann seirbhís chuimsitheach a chur ar fáil ó thuaidh den teorainn.

Tá sé spéisiúil go bhfuil roinnt Gaeilgeoirí sna sé chontae, a bhformhór acu atá ina náisiúntóirí nó poblachtaigh, ag moladh eagraíochtaí a bhaineann leis na sé chontae amháin seachas cinn uile-Éireann – is é sin, cur chuige ‘críochdheighlteach’.

Dar ndóigh, má chreideann tú gurbh fhearr cur chuige do na sé chontae amháin in earnáil na Gaeilge – nach bhféadfaí an dearcadh sin a úsáid le hearnálacha eile?

Ó fógraíodh buaiteoirí na Samhla beagnach sé mhí ó shin níl mórán déanta chun imní an phobail faoin gcóras nua a mhaolú.

Níl sonraí tagtha amach faoi chur chuige na n-eagraíochtaí faoin struchtúr nua, ó na heagraíochtaí nó ón bhForas féin.

Tá éiginnteacht faoi chúraimí eile i gcónaí.

Is é aistriú teanga ó ghlúin go glúin ceann de na cúraimí is bunúsaí ó thaobh chaomhnú agus leathnú na Gaeilge de ach ní raibh sé mar cheann de na sé réimse a phioc an Foras.

Bhí an obair seo ar bun ag Comhluadar ach tá deireadh lena chuid maoinithe anois.

Leanfaidh Comhluadar ar aghaidh ar bhonn deonach ar feadh tamaill ar aon nós agus deirtear go bhfuil seans ann go mbeidh Glór na nGael ag cabhrú le teaghlaigh Ghaelacha amach anseo, ach níl sé seo dearbhaithe.

Is amhlaidh atá sé le seirbhís nuachta Chomhdháil Náisiúnta na Gaeilge – Gaelport.

Bhain an Foras maoiniú ón gComhdháil ach ansin dúirt siad gur tháinig sé ‘aniar aduaidh’ orthu go raibh deireadh le teacht le Gaelport.

Rinne siad moladh amaideach go ritheadh Conradh na Gaeilge an tseirbhís, ach níl na hacmhainní chun cúram eile mar seo a reáchtáil sa ré nua seo curtha ar fáil ag an bhForas don Chonradh.

Tá deireadh le teacht le suíomh na Comhdhála inniu agus tá baol ann nach gcaomhnófaí cartlann Ghaelport fiú, áis thaighde iontach leis na mílte scéalta nuachta a bhaineann leis an teanga.

Arís tá obair dheonach ar bun chun an áis seo a tharrtháil ach ní fios an éireoidh leis.

Is léiriú eile é seo ar an bpraiseach atá déanta ag an bhForas den phróiseas – agus níl ceacht ar bith foghlamtha acu ón scéal seo áfach.

Chuir siad deireadh le maoiniú do nuachtán clóite Gaeilge anuraidh ag rá “nach é an fhormáid chlóite an bealach is oiriúnaí le seirbhís nuachta a sholáthar do phobal léitheoireachta na Gaeilge”.

Ansin bhain siad maoiniú ó Ghaelport, Beo.ie agus Saol.

Cé go bhfuil dhá chonaradh nua d’irisí le bronnadh, cuireadh na foilseacháin idirlín seo ar thine cnámha na hiriseoireachta Gaeilge in éineacht lena gcomhghleacaithe clóite; Lá, Gaelscéal, An tUltach, Feasta agus NÓS.

D’fhéadfadh tubaiste a bheith in ann d’earnáil eile gan mhoill – cur chun cinn na Gaeilge sa phobal.

Anuraidh d’iarr an Foras ar na grúpaí a fhaigheann maoiniú faoin Scéim Phobal Gaeilge iarratais a chur isteach ar scéim nua a mhairfeadh ó 2014-2017.

Tar éis dóibh na tairiscintí móra casta seo a ullmhú d’fhógair an Foras nach mbeadh an scéim nua ag dul ar aghaidh.

Ina ionad sin bronnadh maoiniú sealadach bliana ar an heagraíochtaí le haghaidh 2014.

Ní fios go fóill ceard atá beartaithe ag an bhForas, ach má tá slad le déanamh ar chur chun cinn na Gaeilge sa phobal, is é sin, croílár na hathbheochana, cén chúis atá ann leis an bhForas féin in aon chor?

Arís is arís eile an freagra atá ar an méid atá beartaithe ag an bhForas ná – ‘níl a fhios againn’, agus níl sé sin maith go leor.

Is iar-iriseoir le Lá agus Gaelscéal é Colm Ó Broin. Tá sé mar chathaoirleach deonach ar Choiste Gaeilge Mhuintir Chrónáin i gCluain Dolcáin, Baile Átha Cliath.


Podge supports interculturalism at Gaelscoil

Meitheamh 30, 2014

All-Ireland hurling medal winner, Podge Collins, visited Gaelscoil Mhíchíl Cíosóg in Ennis to raise the school’s new Yellow Flag.

Scéal iomlán – full story: www.clarechampion.ie

Department of Education and Skills publishes key annual statistics for 2013/14 academic year

Meitheamh 30, 2014

Despite huge growth in school going population, pupil teacher ratio is maintained

The Department of Education and Skills is publishing its key statistics for the 2013/14 academic year today.

This document outlines the numbers of students attending primary and post-primary school, the pupil teacher ratios, number of schools and teachers as well as a county by county breakdown of student and classroom numbers.

It shows that the number of children attending primary school has increased by 9,895 at primary level and 4,331 at post-primary (excluding PLCs). Despite these massive rises, pupil teacher ratios at primary school have dropped slightly from 16.4 to 16.3, while they have remained constant at second level at 13.9.

Welcoming the publication, Minister for Education and Skills, Ruairí Quinn T.D. said, “We have a growing population of young people in this country and despite the difficult financial circumstances we face as a country, we prioritised education so that the number of teachers we have in the system has also grown in order to protect pupil teacher ratios.”

“There are a thousand more teachers employed in schools around the country this school year, than there was the year before. While there has been a moratorium on recruitment across other sectors in the public service, this has not applied to teaching and shows the commitment this Government has to educating our future generations.”

The total number of primary schools is now at 3,286 which is down 7 on last year. This decrease is a combination of the establishment of 16 new schools, mainly in areas of growing population, and the closure or amalgamation of 23 schools. The average class size in primary schools has remained relatively unchanged at 24.8.

There are now 1,351 primary schools with less than 100 pupils, with 600 of these having fewer than 50.

There are now 723 second-level schools, up two on last year. Half of these schools have more than 500 pupils, although there are some 15 second level schools with less than 100 pupils.

The total number of full-time students in education institutions funded by the Department of Education and Skills is now at its highest level yet, at more than 1 million. This includes those from primary school to third level[1], including PLC colleges.

The key statistics document can be found at http://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Statistics/Key-Statistics/

The publication date has been significantly improved this year, as previously the data was published in September.


Increasing birth rate puts pressure on schools

Meitheamh 30, 2014

The sharp increase in Ireland’s birth rate over the past 15 years is reflected again the key statistics released by the Department of Education and Skills this morning.

Nearly 16,000 additional children entered our school system last September, with 9,895 additional children at primary and 5,852 at second level.

The process of amalgamating small schools, which is being resisted by communities in rural areas continues apace. Even though there was an increase of almost 10,000 children in our primary schools last year, they were taught in seven fewer schools than in 2012, with the number of mainstream primary school dropping from 3,152 to 3,145.

This decrease is a combination of the establishment of 16 new schools, mainly in areas of growing population, and the closure or amalgamation of 23 schools. There are now 1,351 primary schools with fewer than 100 pupils, with 600 of these having fewer than 50.

This process is also ongoing at second level where the number of secondary schools decreased by two to 373, although there was an increase of four in the number of vocational schools to 256, and by one community and comprehensive school bringing their number to 94, giving an overall increase of two additional second-level schools .

Half of these schools have more than 500 pupils, although 15 second-level schools have less than 100. These changes in the numbers of schools in each sector at second level are reflected in the numbers of students attending each school type, increasing by 3,051 in VEC schools, 1,779 in secondary schools and 1,022 within the community and comprehensive sector.

Surprisingly, given the need to provide education and training for our growing population and to meet the needs of prospective employers, the number of vocational schools offering Post-Leaving Certificate (PLC) programmes dropped from 139 to 131.

PLC programmes

This decrease in colleges offering PLC programmes is reflected in a drop of 1,521 students taking such programmes in 2013/2014, bringing their numbers down to 34,003.

Due to budget changes last year, the pupil-teacher ratio in PLC programmes increased sharply which is reflected in an increase from 18.7 to 19.8. This is in contrast to the PTR in the rest of the second-level sector which remained at 13.9. The number of teachers employed in the PLC sector decreased by 185 to 1,719.

It would appear that Minister for Education and Skills Ruairí Quinn, in attempting to fund increases in our first- and second-level school going population, has done so by cutting back severely the provision for PLC programmes.

Reflecting these additional 15,747 students at first- and second-level, the numbers of teaching posts increased by 1,090, with an increase of 653 teaching staff full-time equivalent posts at first and 437 at second level. There are an additional 653 teaching posts in primary schools but only 270 of them are working as teachers in mainstream classes.


Next Page »